Halo, halo!

21 11 2010

Following on from last week’s article Heart to Heart, about the commissioning of the Sacred Heart paintings, there were two points that I raised for discussion. The first is the suitability of the iconographic form for a Sacred Heart painting. A number of people who spoke to objected to this (some quite forcibly!). If I have understood their points properly, then it seemed to be based upon the idea that the iconographic form is necessarily an Eastern (and one person even said an Orthodox form) so the portrayal of a Western devotion is not appropriate. The first point to make is that the Sacred Heart, although originating in the West, is no longer restricted to it. I was told by a Melkite priest that the Sacred Heart is a popular devotion in the Eastern Church too. Second, this view of icons as being an exclusively Eastern form is contrary to the Catholic view. I have written before, here and here that what characterizes the iconographic form is that it is a style that is consistent with an image of eschatological man – mankind, redeemed, in heaven, so to speak. There are variants of the iconographic form that emanate from the Eastern Church and the Western Church (for example Carolingian, Ottonian or Romanesque art). Therefore, if it is right to represent Christ in the iconographic form at all (and of course it is) then it is right, I would argue, to paint images of the Sacred Heart in that form too. (The same could be said in regard to the other liturgical forms – just as it is appropriate to paint Christ in the gothic and baroque styles, it is appropriate also to paint images of the Sacred Heart in those forms.)

Similarly, the iconographic style is not communicating a message restricted to any particular time in history. It is communicating the timeless realm of heaven. So the time in history when the devotion arose is irrelevant to the discussion. (Although, in fact, the Sacred Heart devotion might even have begun, according to my research as early as the 11th century, which would place it in the period when the standard art form in the West was Romanesque, which was iconographic anyway, also, though not specifically linked to the Sacred Heart devotion, there are a few older images of Christ’s heart as a symbol of love. I found one going back to 450AD).

The other point relates to how we show the light emanating from the heart. The concern of someone, whom I respect as being very knowledgeable on the tradition, that a halo was not appropriate for the heart, although this is a representation of uncreated light, within the tradition the nimbus of light, the halo, has only been applied to the head. Therefore, rays (as one might see in a monstrance) were better. This is a strong argument and worth of further consideration. While we should never say that just because it hasn’t been done before we can’t now, we must be respectful of tradition and try to consider why it hasn’t. On reflection, however, I feel that it is appropriate to use a halo if the artist chooses, but I am still open to persuasion and would love to see any thoughts that readers have on the matter.

Here are the points I would make in response: it is certainly the case that the halo has a strong symbolic meaning beyond simply the pictorial representation of uncreated light. It is telling us something about the person – that this is a saint or the glorified person. When we see a person their head is the place most appropriate visible part that represents the person – we naturally tend to look at the face as of a person as a ‘window to the soul’; and most would not consider for a moment, for example, putting a halo around the hand to say something about the person. However, tradition does say that the heart, perhaps even more than the head, symbolizes a person. The heart is the human centre of gravity, our very core that incorporates body and soul. It is the place that represents the whole person, the vector sum of all our actions and thoughts. This is why the heart represents love. We are made for love and so the place that represents the person is also the symbol of what the person is made for. This is even more the case for the person of Christ, who is not made for love but rather, as God He is Love.

Normally the heart is not visible, so the question as to whether or the artist should apply a halo to it does not come up. However, in this case it is, and I would argue therefore that it is not inappropriate, at least, to put the halo around the heart.

Another point that was raised is that it seems to disembody the heart. It is a matter of opinion as to whether this is a problem, I think. My response to this is that the heart has been no more disembodied by putting a halo around it than it has by placing rays around it. The Maryvale image, which is based upon the visions of St Gertrude in the 13th century, has Christ presenting his heart to us in the palm of his hand, this is quite a disembodying action, it seems to me!

The discussion so far has been concerned with general principles. It does not account for individual taste or the quality of the images portrayed. Even if consistent with the principles that constitute a particular tradition, a painting can still be poorly executed. And I have to say that most of the Sacred Heart images I see are, to my eye, sentimental and unattractive. (There are exceptions. I have included some that appeal to me, including once again the 18th century stain-glass window in the Maryvale Institute in Birmingham.)

Images inserted into text,  from top: from St Patrick’s El Paso, Texas; the Maryvale stain-glass window; a modern icon of the Sacred Heart.

And images below: an 18th century engraving; a 15th century woodcut of the Five Wounds of Christ; a heart and cross from 450AD.


Advertisements

Actions

Information

2 responses

24 11 2010
Nanci Keatley

I have been enjoying your blog since my son, Joshua, started at Thomas More College this fall. I have even been using your Way of Beauty television show for part of my youngest daughter’s home-schooling. My husband has even enjoyed watching it with us! We have read your blog with interest, and I have thought about posting a comment before, but I haven’t.
After this post, however, I felt I must comment. I am a recently “reverted” Catholic who grew up in what I now realize would be considered a fairly nominal Catholic family. The only Catholic-centered artwork we had in our home was a traditional picture of Jesus and a large family Bible that had some illustrations- that sat collecting dust on a bookshelf. Over the last year and a half, my immediate family has made a commitment to becoming Catholic. My husband and kids will be joining the Church at Easter while I had my reconciliation in August and am once again in full communion with the Church.
All of this is to say that I think as long as a piece of artwork with a Catholic world view is not going against Sacred Tradition, Sacred Scripture or the Magisterium, then it should be up to the artist to use a halo or rays around the Sacred Heart. This would be the same for using a halo or rays around a picture of a saint. My kids and I thoroughly enjoy going to our churches’ Adoration Chapel where there are a few different pieces of artwork including one representing the Sacred Heart. We also have a couple of pieces in Joshua’s room (that we use for a prayer room now that he’s at college). Both are different, but they draw us closer to God~ which I think is the main point of any iconic figure.
This is most likely more than you needed to hear from me, but I just wanted to say thank you for helping us on our journey “home to Rome”. I look forward to reading more of your blogs as well as watching the Way of Beauty.

24 11 2010
davidicons

Dear Nanci, how lovely to year from you and interesting to hear a little bit of your story. Best wishes to you and Josh and the family for thanksgiving!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s




%d bloggers like this: